Endometrial ablation is a quick outpatient
treatment for heavy bleeding.
Endometrial ablation is the removal or destruction of the endometrium (lining of the
uterus). It does not require hospitalization, and most women return to
normal activities in a day or two. Ablation is an alternative to hysterectomy for
many women with heavy
uterine bleeding who wish to avoid major surgery. After a
successful endometrial ablation, most women will have little or no menstrual bleeding.
Patient selection and physician experience is essential to a good outcome.
How is endometrial ablation done?
Endometrial ablation has traditionally been done using a hysteroscope. The
procedure was developed by Dr. Goldrath in 1979 using a Nd:YAG laser. I
did the first
endometrial ablation in Northern California in 1985 using the laser. My
results using the laser were excellent, but because
of research done by myself and others, I switched to an instrument called a
resectoscope.
The resectoscope is a special type of
telescope that allows me to see inside the uterus. It has a built in
wire loop that uses high-frequency electrical energy to cut or coagulate
tissue.
The resectoscope has the advantage of being
able to remove polyps and some fibroids at the time of ablation. In
results reported to the FDA where resectoscopic endometrial ablation was done
by experts, the success rate was approximately 95%, with 40% of women having
no bleeding whatsoever in 1 year. In my own patients treated with the
resectoscope as part of those trials, 58% of women had no bleeding
at all after 1 year. It takes extensive experience and skill to be able to
safely use the resectoscope, and obtain this degree of success.
What is a "balloon ablation?"
What about other
devices?
Although
the resectoscope provides excellent results in experienced hands, the
technique is difficult to master. Other methods of ablation have been investigated. The first to obtain FDA
approval was the Thermachoice™ balloon. This uses a balloon
placed in the uterine cavity through the cervix. Hot water is circulated
inside the balloon to destroy the endometrium. Some experts are
concerned about the balloon's ability to reach the cornual areas (the "top
corners") of the uterus. Although the balloon's "success" rate in FDA studies
was reasonable, it had a much lower rate of amenorrhea the other currently
available device — only 13%. I see no advantages and many disadvantages
to it's use, so I do not recommend this device.
The HTA Hydrothermablator® also uses hot water, but allows it to
circulate freely in the endometrial cavity. It is done under direct
vision through a hysteroscope. Once the proper temperature is reached,
the hot water circulates for 10 minutes. One of the original concerns
was about the possibility of fluid leaking out the fallopian tubes and burning
intestines. Although this did not happen in clinical studies, a case of
an intestinal burn is being reviewed by the FDA.
There are other devices available in
this country and other countries, but I think that their disadvantages
outweigh their advantages.
The Novasure System
Another new device, the Novasure System™
, is now available, and has a number of advantages over other systems. It only takes a
few minutes and has an excellent safety record.
Click here for more
information on the Novasure System™
Recovery from endometrial ablation
Most women are able to go home within an hour after
the an endometrial ablation. There may be mild cramping, which can usually
be relieved by ibuprofen. Occasionally stronger medicine may be needed.
It is normal to be tired for a few days, but most women are able to return to
most normal activities in a day or two. Intercourse and very strenuous
activity is usually restricted for 2 weeks. It is normal to have a
increased discharge for 2 to 4 weeks afterward, as the lining is shedding.
I normally do the first check-up 4 weeks afterwards.
Who should consider endometrial ablation?
Women who have menstrual bleeding
that is impacting their life, and do not have other problems that require a
hysterectomy should consider endometrial ablation.
Risks of endometrial ablation
As with any surgical procedure, there
are risks, which should be compared to the risks of things we do in every day
life. A number of things can be done to reduce these risks.
Some of the risks of
endometrial ablation procedures are perforation of the uterus, absorbing
excess fluid, bleeding, infection, injury to organs within the abdomen and
pelvis, and accumulation of blood within the uterus due to scarring.
Another rare, but important, concern after any endometrial ablation procedure
is that it might decrease your doctor's ability to make an early diagnosis of
cancer of the endometrium. Abnormal bleeding should be evaluated whether
or not you have had an ablation.
A small
percentage of properly selected women having an ablation will still eventually need a hysterectomy,
but the vast majority will not. Having done endometrial ablation since
1985, I can often identify women who will have a successful ablation and those
who would be better off with other treatment.
Who shouldn't have an endometrial ablation?
Since an endometrial ablation
destroys the lining of the uterus, endometrial ablation is not
for anyone who desires to keep her fertility. Women who have a malignancy or
pre-malignant condition of the uterus are not candidates for ablation. Women who
have severe pelvic pain, unless the pain is coming from an intracavitary myoma, may be
better served by alternative treatments. Although pregnancy is unlikely
after ablation, serious complications could arise. It is essential for
to use reliable contraception after an endometrial ablation.
Who can help me decide if an endometrial ablation is for me?
It is helpful to see a gynecologist who is familiar with, and who is able to provide
all of the alternatives for the treatment of your problem. A
physician who does not do endometrial ablation on a regular basis is unlikely
to have the experience to help you make the best decision. The physician should be
expert at vaginal-probe ultrasound and at diagnostic hysteroscopy, and should consider non-surgical treatments, as well as discussing the
advantages and disadvantages of all the options available. While the physician can
provide you with information, the decision is ultimately yours.

2003, Paul Indman, MD. All Rights Reserved
15195 National Avenue, Suite 201; Los Gatos, CA 95032
Telephone : 408 358-2788 ; FAX : 408 356-5526
The
medical information presented in this website represents the opinion of Dr.
Indman, and is based on his knowledge and experience. It is not
applicable to all patients or physicians. Anyone visiting this or other
related medical sites should discuss symptoms, findings, and alternatives with
their personal gynecologist.